Abstract on the Examination of The Kinetic Arm Throwing Sleeve and its Effects on Throwing Mechanics
EXAMINATION OF THE KINETIC ARM THROWING SLEEVE AND ITS EFFECTS ON THROWING MECHANICS
Brittany Dowling, MS and Ryan Balmes, DPT
INTRODUCTION
In the overhead throwing athlete, elbow injuries commonly occur, especially in baseball players. Various methods have attempted to manage throwing volume and load via manipulation of training or performance factors, such as pitch counts, inning limits, or pitch type restrictions. However, even with these methods in place elbow injuries continue to rise. In high school, collegiate, and professional baseball pitchers there has been no link to pitch and inning counts and reduced injury risk [1,2]. Recently, a throwing device, The Kinetic Arm, has been developed in attempts to alleviate the stress imparted at the elbow. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of The Kinetic Arm on throwing biomechanics, specifically elbow varus torque, arm rotational velocity, arm rotation, and arm slot.
METHODS
A total of 8 high school and collegiate baseball players (age 18.8±2.9 yrs; height 71.8±1.9 in; weight 183.9±32.2 lbs) were used in this study. Players reported to Elite Edge (Chamblee, GA) facility and were fitted with a motus BASEBALL biomechanics sensor and sleeve (Motus Global, Rockville Centre, NY, USA). Each player was given unlimited time to warm-up for maximum effort throwing. When ready, players were asked to throw 5-8 throws without wearing the Kinetic Arm and then 5-8 throws while wearing the sleeve. Throws were made into a target on a net at a distance of 20 ft away with maximum effort. Players were allowed to crow-hop and were instructed to take their time between throws. Ball velocity was recorded with a radar gun (Pocket Radar, Santa Rosa, CA) for each throw. The sensor recorded four metrics - elbow varus torque, arm rotational velocity, arm rotation, and arm slot - for each throw. Previous research has shown the biomechanics sleeve to be a valid tool for these measurements [3]. For each player, measurements were averaged for both conditions. Paired t-tests were used to compare conditions: wearing and not wearing the sleeve. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Means and standard deviations were calculated for both conditions (Table 1). Elbow varus torque was lower in the sleeve condition (p=0.01). There were no differences in arm rotation, arm speed, or arm slot between conditions. The Kinetic Arm sleeve is a unique intervention that directly manages biomechanics on the throwing upper extremity for the throwing athlete. The Perfect Arm sleeve could be applied to the broad spectrum of the care of the throwing athlete. Specifically, the Kinetic Arm could be utilized for all aspects of the athlete’s preseason, in-season, and post-season management. For rehabilitation of the throwing athlete, the Kinetic Arm could serve as a rehabilitative assistive device for the return-to-sport phase for throwing.
CONCLUSIONS
Wearing The Kinetic Arm device allows for the same throwing mechanics in baseball players while decreasing elbow varus torque. This device can be used in the rehabilitation of players as they progress in their return to throw programs, preseason, in season, or as a workload management tool to reduce stress at the elbow.
REFERENCES
-
Zareminski et al. (2018). Orthop J Sports Med.
-
Saltzman et al. (2018). J Shoulder Elbow Surg
-
Boddy et al. (2019) PeerJ,
|
Table 1: Throwing arm metrics when throwing wearing and not wearing the Kinetic Arm. |
|||
|
Without KA |
With KA |
P-value |
|
|
Torque (Nm) |
42 ±13 |
35±11 |
0.01* |
|
Arm rotation (°) |
154±10 |
152±9 |
0.21 |
|
Arm speed (RPM) |
930±97 |
884±75 |
0.08 |
|
Arm slot (°) |
55±7 |
55±8 |
0.75 |
|
Ball velocity (MPH) |
78±5 |
79±5 |
0.11 |
|
* Significant difference (p<0.05). KA; Kinetic Arm. |
|||
